Closer to the Front Lines
Closer to the Front Lines
When we started Return Path, we added a little clause to our employee handbook that entitled people to a sabbatical after 7 years of service (and then after every 5 incremental years). Six weeks off, 3/4 pay. Full pay if you do something “work related.” Sure, we thought. That’s an easy thing to give. We’ll never be 7 years old as a company.
Now, 8 1/2 years later, of course, the first wave of people are reaching their sabbatical date. A couple have already gone (one trip around the world, one quality time with the kids). A couple others are pending. Four of us at the exec level are overdue to take ours, and we all committed to take them this year, planning them out so we can back each other up. My colleague George Bilbrey is in the middle of his 6 weeks off now, and I’m his backup. And wow – is it a great experience. Busy, but great.
The reason it’s great is that I am one step closer to the action. Usually when someone on my team goes on vacation, we just let things run for that week or two. The people who report into that exec know I’m around if they need something, but I don’t take over actively working with them. Not so this time. Six weeks is too long for that. I’m actively subbing for George. I’m sitting in his office in Colorado every other week for the sabbatical. I have weekly meetings with his staff. I’m working with them on their Q2 goals (for added fun, we’re even working on George’s Q2 goals!). I’m attending meetings that George usually attends but that I’m not invited to.
The insight I’m getting into things in George’s area of the business is great. I’m learning more about the ins and outs of everyone’s work, more about the team dynamic, and more about how the team works with other groups in the company. Most important, I’m learning more about how George and I interact, and how I can manage that interaction better in the future. And I’m making or suggesting some small changes here and there on the margin. Hopefully I’m not messing things up too badly. Otherwise, I will hear about it in 3 1/2 weeks!
I strongly encourage everyone who is a Manager of Managers or higher in their company (especially if that company’s name rhymes with Geturn Fath) to use any vacation of someone on their team as an excuse to really substitute and get closer to the front lines.
Marketing Data: What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You
Marketers have blinders on when it comes to some aspects of data. We‘re so focused on using it to build relationships and businesses, that we don’t pay enough attention to data’s inherent risks. Those risks are real, though. Our brands are constantly under attack, and even trivial oversights in data handling can leave us—and our customers—unacceptably vulnerable. We need to better understand the risks. We need to know more.
If marketers don’t develop industrywide expertise in all aspects of data use, if we can’t demonstrate that we can be trusted stewards of information, we risk losing our rights to use it. The DMA is taking the lead to make sure that we, as an industry, gain the knowledge we need: It’s Institute for Data Governance and Certification is a badly needed program that can make a real difference.
The Institute is a three-day intensive for marketers to learn how to protect their customers and their brands while using the power of data to connect with consumers—and ultimately to grow. The first course begins on July 18th in New York, with more scheduled across the country over the next year.
As many of you know, I chair the DMA’s board, so I’m not a neutral third party when I urge you to attend the Institute and get certified in marketing data governance. But if I’m biased it’s because I’m a passionate industry advocate and I believe that marketers should lead the global effort to champion intelligent, responsible data use. Before we can start, we all need to know what that means.
Please click here to learn more about how you can register for the DMA’s Institute for Data Governance and Certification.
Reverse Engineering Venture Economics
Reverse Engineering Venture Economics
First, they receive a small percentage of their fund as an annual management fee to pay basic operating expenses. These fees range in size, but a typical one is 2% per year. So on the $100 million fund, the GPs will take $2 million per year to pay their salaries, staff, and office expenses.
Second, they receive a percentage of what’s called the carry, or the profits from their investments. Carry percentages have a range as well, but again a typical one is 20%. Here’s where the math starts to get interesting.
Let’s say the GPs invest $4 million in your company at a $12 million pre-money valuation, so they buy 1/4 of the company. You end up selling the company for $40 million a couple years later without taking in additional capital (good for you!), so their 1/4 stake in the company is now worth $10 million. They’ve made a 2.5x return on their invested capital, bringing back a profit of $6 million to their LPs, and they’re entitled to keep 20% of it, or $1.2 million, for themselves.
Fred Wilson talks about the rule of 1/3 in Valuation, where, from a VC’s perspective, 1/3 of deals go really well, 1/3 go sideways (he defines sideways as a 1x-2x return), and 1/3 go badly and they lose most or all of their money.
So based on this rule, let’s say a "good" VC will generate an average return of 2.5x on their LPs’ money over a 5-year period (an IRR of 20%). Now let’s say on average, the GPs make 22 investments of $4 million each to fill out their $100 million fund (less the $10-12 million spent on management fees over the life of the fund), and, again on average, each returns 2.5x (recognizing that many will return zero and a few will return 10x). The VCs will have returned $220 million to their LPs on $100 million invested, for a gain of $120 million (good for them!). The GPs get to keep 20% of that, or $24 million, to split among themselves. Not a bad bonus, on top of their salaries, for 5 years of work across a small number of partners and associates.
Let’s attempt now to compare those earnings to the earnings of an entrepreneur, assuming equal annual cash compensation. An average entrepreneur of a venture-funded company probably owns somewhere between 5-10% of the company by the time the company is sold. In this same average case above, the company is sold for $40 million, so the entrepreneur’s equity will be worth between $2 and $4 million for the same 5 years of work. In this simple case, the GPs in the venture firm have earned a collective $1.2 million, much less on a per-person basis than the entrepreneur. However, in the 5 year period of time where the entrepreneur is working solely on one business, the GPs are working on 25 businesses, earning a collective $30 million. A senior partner in a small firm will end up with $10-12 million. A junior partner maybe more like $2-4 million, comparable to the entrepreneur. However, and this is an important point, most entrepreneurs probably operate at the "seinor partner" level.
So on average, I think the economics probably work out in favor of VCs over entrepreneurs in the long run, mostly because VCs operate a diversified portfolio of companies and entrepreneurs are putting all their eggs in one basket. But on any given deal, I’d rather be the entrepreneur any day of the week – you have more control over value creation, and more of a personal win if things go well. And in the 1/3 of deals that are home runs for the VC, it’s better to be the entrepreneur, since you’re much further along the risk/reward curve and have that chance of seeing your equity turn into $20 million or more in that one shot.
Why Email Stamps Are a Bad Idea
Why Email Stamps Are a Bad Idea
(also posted on the Return Path blog)
Rich Gingras, CEO of Goodmail is an incredibly smart and stand-up professional. I’ve always liked him personally and had a tremendous amount of respect for him. However, the introduction of the email stamp model by Goodmail is a radical departure from the current email ecosystem, and while I’m all for change and believe the spam problem is still real, I don’t think stamps are the answer. Rich has laid out some of his arguments here in the DMNews blog, so I’ll respond to those arguments as well as add some others in this posting. I will also comment on the DMNews blog site itself, but this posting will be more comprehensive and will include everything that’s in the other posting.
It seems that Goodmail’s main argument in favor of stamps is that whitelists don’t work. While he clearly does understand ISPs (he used to work at one), he doesn’t seem to understand the world of publishers and marketers. His solution is fundamentally hostile to the way they do business. I’m happy to have a constructive debate with him about the relative merits of different approaches to solving the false positive problem for mailers and then let the market be the ultimate judge, as it should be.
First, whitelists are in fact working. I know — Return Path runs one called Bonded Sender. We have documented several places that Bonded Senders have a 21% lift on their inbox delivery rates over non-Bonded Senders. It’s hard to see how that translates into “bad for senders” as Rich asserts. When the average inbox deliverability rate is in the 70s, and a whitelist — or, by the way, organic improvements to reputation — can move the needle up to the 90s, isn’t that good?
Second, why, as Goodmail asserts, should marketers pay ISPs for spam-fighting costs? Consumers pay for the email boxes with dollars (at AOL) or with ads (at Google/Yahoo/Hotmail). Good marketers have permission to mail their customers. Why should they have to pay the freight to keep the bad guys away? And for that matter, why is the cost “necessary?” What about those who can’t afford it? We’ve always allowed non-profits and educational institutions to use Bonded Sender at no cost. But beyond that, one thing that’s really problematic for mailers about the Goodmail stamp model is that different for-profit mailers have radically different costs and values per email they send.
For example, maybe a retailer generates an average of $0.10 per email based on sales and proit. So the economics of a $0.003 Goodmail stamp would work. However, they’re only paying $0.001 to deliver that email, and now Goodmail is asserting that they “only” need to pay $0.003 for the stamp. But what about publishers who only generate a token amount per individual email to someone who receives a daily newsletter based on serving a single ad banner? What’s their value per email? Probably closer to $0.005 at most. Stamps sound like they’re going to cost $0.003. It’s hard to see how that model will work for content delivery — and content delivery is one of the best and highest uses of permission-based email.
Next, Rich’s assertion that IP-based whitelists are bad for ISPs and consumers because IP-based solutions have inherent technology flaws that allow senders to behave badly doesn’t make sense. A cryptographically based solution is certainly more sophisticated technology — I’ve never doubted that.
In terms of the practical application, though, I’m not sure there’s a huge difference. Either type of system (IP or crypto) can be breached, either one is trackable, and either one can shut a mailer out of the system immediately — the only difference is that one form of breach would be trackable at the individual email level and the other would only be trackable in terms of the pipeline or IP. I’m not sure either one is more likely to be breached than the other — a malicious or errant spammy email can either be digitally signed or not, and an IP address can’t be hijacked or spoofed much like a digital signature can’t be spoofed.
It’s a little bit like saying your house in the suburbs is more secure with a moat and barbed wire fence around it than with locks on the doors and an alarm system. It’s an accurate statement, but who cares?
I’m not saying that Return Path will never consider cryptographic-based solutions. We absolutely will consider them, and there are some things around Domain Keys (DKIM) that are particularly appealing as a broad-based standard. But the notion that ONLY a cryptographic solution works is silly, and the development of a proprietary technology for authentication and crypotgraphy when the rest of the world is trying desparately to standardize around open source solutions like DKIM is an understandable business strategy, but disappointing to everyone else who is trying to cooperate on standards for the good of the industry. I won’t even get into the costs and time and difficulty that mailers and ISPs alike will have to incur to implement the Goodmail stamp system, which are real. Now mailers are being told they need to implement Sender ID or SPF as an IP-based authentication protocol — and DKIM as a crypto-based protocol — and also Goodmail as a different, competing crypto-based protocol. Oy vey!
Email stamps also do feel like they put the world on a slippery slope towards paid spam — towards saying that money matters more than reputation. I’m very pleased to hear Goodmail clarify in the last couple of days that they are now considering implementing reputation standards around who qualifies for certified mail as well, since that wasn’t their original model. That bodes well for their program and certainly removes the appearance of being a paid spam model. However, I have heard some of the proposed standards that Goodmail is planning on using in industry groups, and the standards seem to be much looser than AOL’s current standards, which, if true, is incredibly disappointing to say the least.
Jupiter analyst David Daniels also makes a good point, which is that stamps do cost money, and money on the line will force mailers to be more cautious about “overmailing” their consumers. But that brings me to my final point about organic deliverability. The mailers who have the best reputations get delivered through most filtering systems. Reputations are based largely on consumer complaints and unknown user rates. So the mailers who do the best job of keeping their lists clean (not overmailing) and only sending out relevant, requested mail (not overmailing) are the ones that will naturally rise to the top in the world of organic deliverability. The stamp model can claim one more forcing function here, but it’s only an incremental step beyond the forcing function of “fear of being filtered” and not worth the difficulty of adopting it, or the costs, or the risks associated with it.
Rich, I hope to continue to dialog with you, and as noted in my prior posting, I think separating the issues here is healthy.
Book Shorts: Summer Reading
I read a ton of books. I usually blog about business books, at least the good ones. I almost never blog about fiction or non-business/non-fiction books, but I had a good “what did you read this summer” conversation the other night with my CEO Forum, so I thought I’d post super quick snippets about my summer reading list, none of which was business-related.
If you have kids, don’t read Sheryl Sandberg and Adam Grant’s Option B: Facing Adversity, Building Resilience, and Finding Joy unless you’re prepared to cry or at least be choked up. A lot. It is a tough story to read, even if you already know the story. But it does have a number of VERY good themes and thoughts about what creates resilience (spoiler alert – my favorite key to resilience is having hope) that are wonderful for personal as well as professional lives.
Underground Airlines, by Ben Winters, is a member of a genre I love – alternative historical fiction. This book is set in contemporary America – except that its version of America never had a Civil War and therefore still has four slave states. It’s a solid caper in its own right, but it’s a chillingly realistic portrayal of what slavery and slave states would be like today and what America would be like with them.
Hillbilly Elegy, by J.D. Vance, is the story of Appalachia and white working class Americans as told by someone who “escaped” from there and became a marine, then a Yale-educated lawyer. It explains a lot about the struggles of millions of Americans that are easy for so many of us to ignore or have a cartoonish view of. It explains, indirectly, a lot about the 2016 presidential election.
Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, and What the Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are, written by Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, was like a cross between Nate Silver’s The Signal and The Noise and Levitt & Dubner’s Freakonomics. It’s full of interesting factoids derived from internet data. Probably the most interesting thing about it is how even the most basic data (common search terms) are proving to be great grist for the big data mill.
P.J. O’Rourke’s How the Hell Did This Happen? was a lot like the rest of P.J. O’Rourke’s books, but this time his crusty sarcasm is pointed at the last election in a compilation of articles written at various points during the campaign and after. It didn’t feel to me as funny as his older books. But that could also be because the subject was so depressing. The final chapter was much less funny and much more insightful, not that it provides us with a roadmap out of the mess we’re in.
Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, by Noah Harari, is a bit of a rambling history of our species. It was a good read and lots of interesting nuggets about biology, evolution, and history, though it had a tendency to meander a bit. It reminded me a bit of various Richard Dawkins books (I blogged a list of them and one related business topic here), so if you’re into that genre, this wouldn’t be bad to pick up…although it’s probably higher level and less scientific than Dawkins if that’s what you’re used to.
Finally, I finished up the fourth book in the massive Robert Caro quadrilogy biography of Lyndon Johnson (full series here). I have written a couple times over the years about my long-term reading project on American presidential biographies, probably now in its 12th or 13th year. I’m working my way forward from George Washington, and I usually read a couple on each president, as well as occasional other related books along the way. I’ve probably read well over 100 meaty tomes as part of this journey, but none as meaty as what must have been 3000+ pages on LBJ. The good news: What a fascinating read. LBJ was probably (with the possible exception of Jefferson) the most complex character to ever hold the office. Also, I’d say that both Volumes 3 and 4 stand alone as interesting books on their own – Volume 3 as a braoder history of the Senate and Civil Rights; Volume 4 as a slice of time around Kennedy’s assassination and Johnson’s assumption of power. The bad news: I got to the end of Vol 4 and realized that there’s a Vol 5 that isn’t even published yet.
That’s it for summer reading…now back to school!
Startup CEO (OnlyOnce- the book!), Part III – Pre-Order Now
Startup CEO (OnlyOnce – the book!), Part III – Pre-Order Now
My book, Startup CEO: A Field Guide to Scaling Up Your Business, is now available for pre-order on Amazon in multiple formats (Print, Kindle), which is an exciting milestone in this project! The book is due out right after Labor Day, but Brad Feld tells me that the more pre-orders I have, the better. Please pardon the self-promotion, but click away if you’re interested!
Here are a few quick thoughts about the book, though I’ll post more about it and the process at some point:
- I’ll be using the hashtag #startupceo more now to encourage discussion of topics related to startup CEOs – please join me!
- The book has been described by a few CEOs who read it and commented early for me along the lines of “The Lean Startup movement is great, but this book starts where most of those books end and takes you through the ‘so you have a product that works in-market – now what?’ questions”
- The book is part of the Startup Revolution series that Brad has been working on for a couple years now, including Do More (Even) Faster, Venture Deals, Startup Communities, and Startup Life (with two more to come, Startup Boards and Startup Metrics)
- Writing a book is a LOT harder than I expected!
At this point, the best thing I can do to encourage you to read/buy is to share the full and final table of contents with you, sections/chapters/headings. When I get closer in, I may publish some excerpts of new content here on Only Once. Here’s the outline:
Part I: Storytelling
- Chapter 1: Dream the Possible Dream…Entrepreneurship and Creativity, “A Faster Horse,” Vetting Ideas
- Chapter 2: Defining and Testing the Story…Start Out By Admitting You’re Wrong, A Lean Business Plan Template, Problem, Solution, Key Metrics, Unique Value Proposition and Unfair Advantages, Channels, Customer Segments, Cost Structure and Revenue Streams
- Chapter 3: Telling the Story to Your Investors…The Business Plan is Dead. Long Live the Business Plan, The Investor Presentation, The Elevator Pitch, The Size of the Opportunity, Your Competitive Advantage, Current Status and Roadmap from Today, The Strength of Your Team, Summary Financials, Investor Presentations for Larger Startups
- Chapter 4: Telling the Story to Your Team…Defining Your Mission, Vision and Values, The Top-down Approach, The Bottom-Up Approach, The Hybrid Approach, Design a Lofty Mission Statement
- Chapter 5: Revising the Story…Workshopping, Knowing When It’s Time to Make a Change, Corporate Pivots: Telling the Story Differently, Consolidating, Diversifying, Focusing, Business Pivots: Telling a Different Story
- Chapter 6: Bringing the Story to Life…Building Your Company Purposefully, The Critical Elements of Company-Building, Articulating Purpose: The Moral of the Story, You Can Be a Force for Helping Others—Even If Indirectly
Part II: Building the Company’s Human Capital
- Chapter 7: Fielding a Great Team…From Protozoa to Pancreas, The Best and the Brightest, What About HR?, What About Sales & Marketing?, Scaling Your Team Over Time
- Chapter 8: The CEO as Functional Supervisor…Rules for General Managers
- Chapter 9: Crafting Your Company’s Culture…, Introducing Fig Wasp #879, Six Legs and a Pair of Wings, Let People Be People, Build an Environment of Trust
- Chapter 10: The Hiring Challenge…Unique Challenges for Startups, Recruiting Outstanding Talent, Staying “In-Market”, Recruitment Tools, The Interview: Filtering Potential Candidates, Two Ears One Mouth, Who Should You Interview?, Onboarding: The First 90 Days
- Chapter 11: Every Day in Every Way, We Get a Little Better…The Feedback Matrix, 1:1 Check-ins, “Hallway” Feedback, Performance Reviews, The 360, Soliciting Feedback on Your Own Performance, Crafting and Meeting Development Plans
- Chapter 12: Compensation…General Guidelines for Determining Compensation, The Three Elements of Startup Compensation, Base Pay, Incentive Pay, Equity
- Chapter 13: Promoting …Recruiting from Within, Applying the “Peter Principle” to Management, Scaling Horizontally, Promoting Responsibilities Rather than Swapping Titles
- Chapter 14: Rewarding: “It’s the Little Things” That Matter…It Never Goes Without Saying, Building a Culture of Appreciation
- Chapter 15: Managing Remote Offices and Employees…Brick and Mortar Values in a Virtual World, Best Practices for Managing Remote Employees
- Chapter 16: Firing: When It’s Not Working…No One Should Ever Be Surprised to Be Fired, Termination and the Limits of Transparency, Layoffs
Part III: Execution
- Chapter 17: Creating a Company Operating System…Creating Company Rhythms, A Marathon? Or a Sprint?
- Chapter 18: Creating Your Operating Plan and Setting Goals…Turning Strategic Plans into Operating Plans, Financial Planning, Bringing Your Team into Alignment with Your Plans, Guidelines for Setting Goals
- Chapter 19: Making Sure There’s Enough Money in the Bank…Scaling Your Financial Instincts, Boiling the Frog, To Grow or to Profit? That Is the Question, First Perfect the Model, Choosing Growth, Choosing Profits, The Third Way
- Chapter 20: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Financing…Equity Investors, Venture Capitalists, Angel Investors, Strategic Investors, Debt, Convertible Debt, Venture Debt, Bank Loans, Personal Debt, Bootstrapping, Customer Financing, Your Own Cash Flow
- Chapter 21: When and How to Raise Money…When to Start Looking for VC Money, The Top 11 Takeaways for Financing Negotiations
- Chapter 22: Forecasting and Budgeting…Rigorous Financial Modeling, Of Course You’re Wrong—But Wrong How?, Budgeting in a Context of Uncertainty, Forecast, Early and Often
- Chapter 23: Collecting Data…External Data, Learning from Customers, Learning from (Un)Employees, Internal Data, Skip-Level Meetings, Subbing, Productive Eavesdropping
- Chapter 24: Managing in Tough Times…Managing in an Economic Downturn, Hope Is Not a Strategy—But It’s Not a Bad Tactic, Look for Nickels and Dimes under the Sofa, Never Waste a Good Crisis, Managing in a Difficult Business Situation
- Chapter 25: Meeting Routines…Lencioni’s Meeting Framework, Skip-Level Meetings, Running a Productive Offsite
- Chapter 26: Driving Alignment…Five Keys to Startup Alignment, Aligning Individual Incentives with Global Goals
- Chapter 27: Have You Learned Your Lesson?…The Value (and Limitations) of Benchmarking, The Art of the Post-Mortem
- Chapter 28: Going Global…Should Your Business Go Global?, How to Establish a Global Presence, Overcoming the Challenges of Going Global, Best Practices for Managing International Offices and Employees
- Chapter 29: The Role of M&A…Using Acquisitions as a Tool in Your Strategic Arsenal, The Mechanics of Financing and Closing Acquisitions, Stock, Cash, Earn Out, The Flipside of M&A: Divestiture, Odds and Ends, Integration (and Separation)
- Chapter 30: Competition…Playing Hardball, Playing Offense vs. Playing Defense, Good and Bad Competitors
- Chapter 31: Failure…Failure and the Startup Model, Failure Is Not an Orphan
Part IV: Building and Leading a Board of Directors
- Chapter 32: The Value of a Good Board…Why Have a Board?, Everybody Needs a Boss, The Board as Forcing Function, Pattern Matching, Forests, Trees, Honest Discussion and Debate
- Chapter 33: Building Your Board…What Makes a Great Board Member?, Recruiting a Board Member, Compensating Your Board, Boards as Teams, Structuring Your Board, Board Size, Board Committees, Chairing the Board, Running a Board Feedback Process, Building an Advisory Board
- Chapter 34: Board Meeting Materials…“The Board Book”, Sample Return Path Board Book, The Value of Preparing for Board Meetings
- Chapter 35: Running Effective Board Meetings…Scheduling Board Meetings, Building a Forward-Looking Agenda, In-Meeting Materials, Protocol, Attendance and Seating, Device-Free Meetings, Executive and Closed Sessions
- Chapter 36: Non-Board Meeting Time…Ad Hoc Meetings, Pre-Meetings, Social Outings
- Chapter 37: Decision-Making and the Board…The Buck Stops—Where?, Making Difficult Decisions in Concert, Managing Conflict with Your Board
- Chapter 38: Working with the Board on Your Compensation and Review…The CEO’s Performance Review, Your Compensation, Incentive Pay, Equity, Expenses
- Chapter 39: Serving on Other Boards…The Basics of Serving on Other Boards, Substance, or Style?
Part V: Managing Yourself So You Can Manage Others
- Chapter 40: Creating a Personal Operating System…Managing Your Agenda, Managing Your Calendar, Managing Your Time, Feedback Loops
- Chapter 41: Working with an Executive Assistant…Finding an Executive Assistant, What an Executive Assistant Does
- Chapter 42: Working with a Coach…The Value of Executive Coaches, Areas Where an Executive Coach Can Help
- Chapter 43: The Importance of Peer Groups…The Gang of Six, Problem-Solving in Tandem
- Chapter 44: Staying Fresh…Managing the Highs and Lows, Staying Mentally Fresh, At Your Company, Out and About, Staying Healthy, Me Time
- Chapter 45: Your Family…Making Room for Home Life, Involving Family in Work, Bringing Work Principles Home
- Chapter 46: Traveling…Sealing the Deal with a Handshake, Making the Most of Travel Time, Staying Disciplined on the Road
- Chapter 47: Taking Stock of the Year…Celebrating “Yes”; Addressing “No”, Are You Having Fun?, Are You Learning and Growing as a Professional?, Is It Financially Rewarding?, Are You Making an Impact?
- Chapter 48: A Note on Exits…Five Rules of Thumb for Successfully Selling Your Company
If you’re still with me and interested, again here are the links to pre-order (Print, Kindle).
The Best Laid Plans, Part III
The Best Laid Plans, Part III
Once you’ve finished the Input Phase and the Analysis Phase of producing your strategic plan, you’re ready for the final Output Phase, which goes something like this:
Vision articulation. Get it right for yourself first. You should be able to answer “where do we want to be in three years?” in 25 words or less.
Roadmap from today. Make sure to lay out clearly what things need to happen to get from where you are today to where you want to be. The sooner-in stuff needs to be much clearer than the further out stuff.
Resource Requirements. Identify the things you will need to get there, and the timing of those needs – More people? More marketing money? A new partner?
Financials. Lay them out at a high level on an annual basis, on a more detailed level for the upcoming year.
Packaging. Create a compelling presentation (Powerpoint, Word, or in your case, maybe something more creative) that is crisp and inspiring.
Pre-selling. Run through it – or a couple of the central elements of it – with one or two key people first to get their buy-in.
Selling. Do your roadshow – hit all key constituents with the message in one way or another (could be different forms, depending on who).
The best thing to keep in mind is that there is no perfect process, and there’s never a “right answer” to strategy — at least not without the benefit of hindsight!
People have asked me what the time allocation and elapsed time should or can be for this process. While again, there’s no right answer, I typically find that the process needs at least a full quarter to get right, sometimes longer depending on how many inputs you are tracking down and how hard they are to track down; how fanatical you are about the details of the end product; and whether this is a refresh of an existing strategy or something where you’re starting from a cleaner sheet of paper. In terms of time allocation, if you are leading the process and doing a lot of the work yourself, I would expect to dedicate at least 25% of your time to it, maybe more in peak weeks. It’s well worth the investment.
Patience vs. Impatience
Patience and Impatience are both critical tools in the founder toolbelt. That sounds kind of funny since they’re at odds with each other. Let me explain.
Patience is hard, but there are some things that require it. As they say metaphorically about Product, nine women can’t make a baby in a month. Products needs to be built, tested in the wild, marinate with clients. GTM motions take time to figure out. Brands take time to build unless you have billions to throw at the problem. Bread takes time to rise. Patience is a really useful tool when people on your team or board get itchy for success and you need to calm them down and keep them focused.
Impatience, on the other hand, is easy, and you have to moderate it. Once we have a vision…don’t we want it to become reality yesterday? Why is that roadmap item taking so damn long? Where’s the blog post? We already agreed to terms on the financing, why do the lawyers need to take 60 days and $50,000 to paper it?
How do you know when to use which tool?
Be patient with the seemingly impossible – changing the world, changing people’s habits, changing thoughts and perceptions all take time. But be impatient with those eminently possible and important items – the things someone on the team or you need to knock off a to do list to advance the business.
Most of all, be impatient for success and tangible signs of progress. Turning your vision into a viable business requires that kind of fire within you.
State of Colorado COVID-19 Innovation Response Team, Part IV – Replacing Myself, Days 7-9
(This is the fourth post in a series documenting the work I did in Colorado on the Governor’s COVID-19 Innovation Response Team – IRT. Other posts in order are 1, 2, and 3.)
Monday, March 23, Day 7
- Wellness screening – put hot cup of coffee against my temples – now finally the thermometer works (although I can’t say that it gives me a high degree of comfort that I have figured out a workaround!)
- Furious execution and still backlog is growing no matter how much I do – thank goodness team is growing. Never seen this before – work coming in faster than I can process it, and I am a fast processer. Inbox clean when I go to bed, up to 75 when I wake up, never slows down
- Private sector explosion – this guy can print 3D swabs – but are they compliant? This guy has an idea for cleansing PPE, this guy can do 3D printing of Ventilator replacement parts, etc. How to corral?
- Corporate Volunteer form is up – 225 entries in the first 12 hours – WOW
- Congressmen and Senators – people contact them, so they want to help, they want to make news, not coordinated enough with state efforts
- Jay Want – early diagnosis losing sense of smell – low tech way to New Normal
- Coordination continues to be key – multiple cabinet level agencies doing their own thing while multiple private sector groups are doing their own thing (e.g. App – “everyone thinks they’re the only people who have this idea”)
- Mayor of Denver just announced lockdown, I guess that trumps the state solution in town, maybe it’s ok since that just leaves rural areas a bit fuzzier
- Need to revise OS – team is about to go from 3 to 9, private sector spinning up
- Brad OS and State employee OS are different – Slack/Trello/Zoom are not tools state employees are familiar with or can even access. Now what?
- Kacey insists the team works remotely other than leaders and critical meetings so we can role model social distancing. GOOD CALL
- One of our private sector guys goes rogue on PR, total bummer – this part (comms) about what we are doing could be more coordinated for sure, but not a priority
- Lots of texts/call with Jared, such a smart and thoughtful guy, really interesting
Tuesday, March 24, Day 8
- Been a week, feels like a month
- Fluid changes to both OS for team and OS for private sector group
- Zoom licenses – state will take a couple weeks to procure them, gotta work around it with Brad
- Slack app won’t get through the firewall. Maybe IT’s supervisor can do us a favor?
- Comp – interesting expedited process – normally takes 65 days to get approval for temps, today we got it done in an hour! Comp levels seem incredibly low. But we got done what we needed to get done
- Some minor territorial conflicts with state tech team and our private sector tech team. Will have to resolve. Surprising how few of these there have been so far given that our team is new and shiny and breaking rules
- Big new Team meeting for first time with Sarah in lead, Red/Yellow/Green check-in (I like that – may have to borrow it!)
- Starting to feel obsolete – love that! Sarah crushing it, totally feels like the right leader, need to make sure she has enough support (might need an admin?)
- Also…maybe I’m not feeling well? A little worried I am getting sick. Hope that’s not true, or if it is, hope it’s not the BAD kind of sick. Going to go work from hotel rest of afternoon
- Call with Jared – concern about managing state’s psychology – testing and isolation services
- Prep for press conference tomorrow
Wednesday, March 25, Day 9
- Woke up feeling awesome – phew – hopefully that was just fatigue or stress induced
- Sarah drowning a bit, feels like me on my 3rd day so makes sense
- Reigning in and organizing private sector seems like a full time job. We are going to recruit my friend Michelle (ex-RP) to come work with Brad on volunteer management. HALLELUJAH!
- Whiteboard meeting with Kacey holding up her laptop so they can see it on Zoom – hilarious – technology not really working, but we are making the best of it
- State role – facilitate alt supply chain to hospitals since normal chain is broken…also maintain emergency state cache – complex but makes more sense now
- More territorial things starting to pop up with state government…processing volunteers
- Comms overload – here comes the text to alert you to the email to alert you to the phone call
- This team/project is clearly a case of finite resources meets infinite scope and infinite volunteer hand-raising
- Gov press conference – issues Stay at Home order through April 11 (interesting, that wasn’t in the version of the talking points I saw several hours before)
- Meeting some of our new team members. I can’t even keep up with them, I think we’re up to 15+ now. Kacey and Kyle are recruiting machines and all these people’s managers are just loaning to us immediately. Love that.
- Amazingly talented and dedicated state employees – seem young, probably not paid well, but superior to private sector comprables in some ways
- Talk with Kacey and Sarah about staff/not drowning
- Kacey feels like Sarah is doing a great job, so she cleared me to go home (wouldn’t have gone without her saying ok, she understands how this whole thing is working way better than I do – I guess that’s what a good chief of staff does!)
Stay tuned for more tomorrow…
Book Short: The Little Engine that Could
Book Short: The Little Engine that Could
Authors Steven Woods and Alex Shootman would make Watty Piper proud. Instead of bringing toys to the children on the other side of the mountain, though, this engine brings revenue into your company. If you run a SaaS business, or really if you run any B2B business, Revenue Engine: Why Revenue Performance Management is the Next Frontier of Competitive Advantage, will change the way you think about Sales and Marketing. The authors, who were CTO and CRO of Eloqua (the largest SaaS player in the demand management software space that recently got acquired by Oracle), are thought leaders in the field, and the wisdom of the book reflects that.
The book chronicles the contemporary corporate buying process and shows that it has become increasingly like the consumer buying process in recent years. The Consumer Decision Journey, first published by McKinsey in 2009, chronicles this process and talks about how the traditional funnel has been transformed by the availability of information and social media on the Internet. Revenue Engine moves this concept to a B2B setting and examines how Marketing and Sales are no longer two separate departments, but stewards of a combined process that requires holistic analysis, investment decisions, and management attention.
In particular, the book does a good job of highlighting new stages in the buying process and the imperatives and metrics associated with getting this “new funnel” right. One that resonated particularly strongly with me was the importance of consistent and clean data, which is hard but critical! As my colleague Matt Spielman pointed out when we were discussing the book, the one area of the consumer journey that Revenue Engine leaves is out is Advocacy, which is essential for influencing the purchase process in a B2B environment as well.
One thing I didn’t love about the book is that it’s a little more theoretical than practical. There aren’t nearly enough detailed examples. In fact, the book itself says it’s “a framework, not an answer.” So you’ll be left wanting a bit more and needing to do a bit more work on your own to translate the wisdom to your reality, but you’ll have a great jumping off point.
Everything is Data, Part II – Get Those Expenses In
Everything is Data, Part II – Get Those Expenses In
My friend and former colleague Angela Baldonero (used to run our People Team at Return Path, now is COO of super cool startup Procurify), used to say about her job as head of HR, “Everything is Data.” She guest blogged about that principle on OnlyOnce years ago here , and she particularly cited this theory when talking about the recruiting and hiring process.
I’ve thought about this principle a lot over the years, and I’ve occasionally come up with other examples where I think peripheral data can inform whether or not an employee will succeed, at least in my world. I don’t know how many of these can be caught in an interview process, but that’s worth thinking about. Here’s one for today’s post: I’ve noticed a very high correlation over the years between poor performance and being late turning in expenses.
I know, it sounds silly. But think about it. Most of the work we do involves some level of being organized, being on time, prioritizing work and working efficiently, and caring about money (whether the company’s money or our own money). Someone who can’t bother to fill out a quick expense report following a business trip is demonstrating an absence of all of those traits. The most glaring example of it we ever had here involved a fairly senior sales executive years ago who was delinquent in his expenses to the tune of over $40,000. That’s right, $40,000. It was so bad that our auditors made us footnote it in our annual audit. We begged him to turn in his expenses. We even offered to have him send a pile of all the receipts to us and have someone in Accounting help him out. But he was always too busy, made too many excuses for why he couldn’t get them done. I think it ended up taking us firing him for him to actually clean them up and get paid back. Why did we fire him? He was ineffective in his role, unresponsive to colleagues, unable to prioritize his work, and sloppy in his deliverables.
By the way, the opposite is not true – someone who is incredibly punctual about getting expenses in is not guaranteed to be a high performer, although they are usually guaranteed to at least be organized (which for some roles may be a critical success factor).
I suppose ultimately this is just another example of Broken Windows, which I blogged about in two different places, here and here.